High CourtsSingle Bench(2022) 02 SHI CK 0005

Anil Kumar vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 4 February 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 443 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 198 words

Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J

1.

When the instant matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the writ petitioner fairly states that his client would be satisfied if he is permitted to

file a representation before the authorities concerned. The prayer being innocuous is allowed. The petitioner is permitted to file representation within a

period of one week from today.

2.

Learned Additional Advocate General states that the representation, so made by writ petitioner shall be decided sympathetically in a time bound

manner.

3.

In view of above, the instant petition is disposed of by ordering that the respondents concerned shall decide representation of the writ petitioner

within three weeks from today and pass a reasoned order, in accordance with law. It is also made clear that in the meanwhile respondents will not

take any coercive action against the petitioner. It is also ordered that respondents shall also consider the posting of the petitioner, if possible, at Govt.

Middle School Basai, Under Complex GSSS Makeri, District Mandi.

However, it is made clear that if the writ petitioner is still aggrieved, he has every right to approach this Court. Pending application(s), if any, also

stands disposed of.

Copy dasti.