Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2019) 12 NCLT CK 0502

Aneetha Subramaniam vs Maharaja Theme Parks And Resorts Limited

National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai · Decided on 19 December 2019

HON’BLE JUDGES
B.S.V. Prakash Kumar, Member (Judicial) · S. Vijayaraghavan, Member (Technical)
CASE NUMBER
MA/1369/2019 in CP/1314/IB/2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 545 words

Per: B.S.V PRAKASH KUMAR, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

It is an MA filed u/s 33(2) of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ("the Code") by the Resolution Professional (in Short "RP") seeking an order of liquidation based on the resolution passed in the CoC meeting on 20.09.2019.

2.

On perusal of this application it appears that the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) has been initiated against the Corporate Debtor by appointing Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) on 08.04.2019 with a direction to issue public notice on 12.04.2019, upon which, the claims being collated, the IRP identified the sole financial creditor (Karur Vysya Bank) having a claim of ₹ 238.64 crores. In pursuance thereof, 1st CoC meeting was held on 09.05.2019, wherein the IRP was appointed as Resolution Professional (RP). Owing to non-cooperation from suspended directors Section 19(2) application was filed and it was disposed of on 03.10.2019 with a direction to the suspended directors to disclose the information that was sought by the Resolution Professional. On the valuation report given by the Valuers in this case, the Resolution Professional determined the fair/partial value of the Corporate Debtor as ₹ 6.68 crores and liquidation value as ₹ 3.34 crores. On the Information Memorandum prepared by the Resolution Professional as per Regulation 36 of the CIRP Regulations and subsequently when invitation of Expression of Interest was given on 23.07.2019 with a cut off date of 01.09.2019, since no applicant came forward to submit EOI, the CoC, in the meeting dated 20.09.2019, passed a resolution by 100% voting for liquidation of this Company.

3.

Looking at the averments mentioned by the Resolution Professional, we are of the view that CoC has consciously taken a decision for liquidation of the Company for nobody has come forward, in view thereof, MA/1369/2019 is hereby Allowed and order liquidation of the Company with directions as follows:

a)

This Bench hereby orders the Corporate Debtor to be liquidated in the manner as laid down in the Chapter by issuing a public notice stating that the Corporate Debtor is in liquidation with a direction to the liquidator to send this order to ROC with which this company has been registered.

b)

The Resolution professional viz Mr R. Aneetha Subramaniam is hereby appointed to act as Liquidator for the purpose of liquidation of the corporate debtor, therefore all powers of the board of directors, Key managerial personnel and partners of the Corporate Debtor, as the case may be, shall addition to the earlier reliefs sought, it cannot be called that this Petitioner has come with a different relief inconsistent with the pleadings of the main Company Petition, therefore, we are of the considered opinion that this Applicant is even entitled to ask the relief declaring the rights issue notice as null and void, hence allowed to amend the main Petition.

7.

In view of the reasons aforementioned, we hereby allow these amendments to be incorporated in the main Company Petition with liberty to the Respondents to file their reply over the additional reliefs included in the main Company Petition. Accordingly, this IA/269/2019 is hereby allowed.

8.

The Applicant is hereby directed to file amended Company Petition copy by supplying it to other side within one week hereof and reply, if any, by the Respondents within two weeks thereof.