High CourtsSingle Bench(2022) 02 OHC CK 0091

Ananda Mohapatra vs State Of Odisha And Others

Orissa High Court · Decided on 11 February 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arindam Sinha, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 2936 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 333 words

Arindam Sinha, J

1.

Mr. Mohanty, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, his client and private opposite parties presented their sale deed for

registration. By impugned refusal order dated 12th January, 2022, registration was refused. He submits, provision in clause (a) of sub section (2) under

section 3 in Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 was invoked to refuse. This was in excess of jurisdiction.

2.

Mr. Tripathy, learned advocate, Additional Standing Counsel appears on behalf of State and submits, statutory appeal is available remedy. The writ

petition cannot be maintained.

3.

In impugned refusal order, inter alia, following was said:-

“The venders in their presented deed has enclosed the certificate of encumbrance in respect of aforesaid landed properties. On verification from the E.C., it is

ascertained that, the vendors have already sold more than 500Sq. meters of land from plot No.301 out of total plotted area Ac.0.590dec. in 2 nos. of sale deeds

executed on 15.01.2021 and 12.02.2021.

The aforesaid plotted area of mouza Bargarh are coming under Town Planning and Municipal area and thus needs registration under section 3(2) (a) of Real

Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.â€​

4.

The provision implies requirement of registration in event area of land proposed to be developed exceeds 500Sq. meters or number of apartments

proposed to be developed exceeds it, inclusive of all phases. Impugned order does not specify the excess parameters of subject matter of the sale

deed requiring registration under the provision in the Act.

5.

Impugned order is set aside and quashed on having been issued without basis, thus non-application of mind. Petitioner and private opposite parties

will present their documents again to opposite party no.4. Said opposite party will deal with the presentation, to either register the document or refuse it

on good reason, specifying the parameters, in event the refusal is reiterated based on the provision. Either way the authority must act within a week of

presentation.

6.

The writ petition is disposed of.

.........................