High CourtsDivision Bench(1984) 11 BOM CK 0062

Amritlal Chunilal Katariya and Another vs Maharashtra State Transport Corpn. and Others

Bombay High Court · Decided on 22 November 1984 · Citation: (1985) 1 ACC 516 : (1986) ACJ 605

HON’BLE JUDGES
V.V. Vaze, J · C.S. Dharmadhikari, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 278 words

V.V. Vaze, J.—Sachin, the two years'' old son of Amritlal Katariya a practising Advocate of Ahmednagar was killed as be came under S.T. bus bearing No. MHD-904 belonging to opponents 1 and 2 which was being driven by Shaikh Abdul Shaikh Shahji-opponent No. 4 on 28.6.1979. The parents of the child filed a claim petition before the Claims Tribunal. Ahmednagar which awarded damages to the extent of Rs. 4,000/- which the parents consider as inadequate.

2.

As the child was only two years'' old no arguments have been addressed regarding any contributory negligence though an observation was made by the trial Court that the parents were negligent in allowing the children to play on the roads. According to Amritlal, Sachin was a bright boy and the parents had the resources as well as ambition to educate him so that he qualifies as a doctor or an engineer. Alkan and Amritlal, the parents of the child, say that they were shocked due to the death of their only son.

3.

It appears that Amritlal is practising law, paying Income Tax and has also landed property. The damages inasmuch as case payable to the parents on account of death of an infant would comprise mainly element of shock and the damages on that account of shock, pain and sufferings as well as loss of expectancy of life are assessed at Rs. 10,000/-.

4.

Partly allowing the appeal, the order of the Tribunal is modified by substituting the figure of Rs. 10,000/- for Rs. 4,000/- occurring in the second line of the operative portion of the order. Rest of the order stands confirmed. No order as to costs in this Court.