High CourtsDivision Bench(2018) 08 CHH CK 0052

Amresh Dubey vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 1 August 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ajay Kumar Tripathi, CJ · Prashant Kumar Mishra, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 16 Of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 383 words

Prashant Kumar Mishra, J

1.

Learned counsel representing the appellant now takes the least line of resistance while making his submissions against the impugned order dated

02.01.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing his writ petition.

2.

The origin of the present dispute relates to an excise licence, which the appellant had and which expired on 31.03.2017 and was not renewed,

because the Establishment or the Hotel fell foul of the directives issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Tamil Nadu and others

vs K. Balu and another, reported in (2017) 2 SCC 281 and had been cancelled.

3.

The Hon'ble Apex Court clarified its previous directions and the State of Chhattisgarh thereafter decided to make certain changes and amendments

to the previous Chhattisgarh Excise Act, 1915, as amended in 2017.

4.

The effect of the amendment to Clause 17 (3) (b) has already been dealt with by the learned Single Judge, therefore, we are not required to

reconsider that aspect of the matter.

5.

Even if the petitioner/appellant has failed in his endeavor to get his excise licence renewed by giving an interpretation to Section 17 (3) (b), it is

nobody's case that if a hotel satisfies the conditions in terms of the present prevalent Excise Act and Rules of Chhattisgarh, his application for

issuance of a licence, on an application made satisfying all the requirements and the yardsticks, cannot be considered again.

6.

The learned Single Judge in paragraph 8 of the impugned order has taken note that a hotel can be granted bar licence having a three star rating and

since he does not possess such a qualification, the refusal by the Excise Authority to renew or issue a licence in his favour cannot be said to be an

erroneous order or interpretation.

7.

However, keeping the totality of the issue in mind and the order dated 22.09.2017, which was Annexure-P/1 and subject matter of challenge in the

writ petition, if the appellant fulfills all the requirements, which are mandated under the New Chhattisgarh Excise Amended Act of 2017, to become

eligible for grant of such excise licence, he will be free to apply and it will be considered on its own merits.

8.

The appeal stands disposed off with the observation as above.