Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2000) 01 SC CK 0133

Amitadyuti Kumar vs State of W.B. and Others

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 21 January 2000 · Citation: (2000) 4 JT 409 : (2000) 9 SCC 404

HON’BLE JUDGES
R. C. Lahoti, J · G. B. Pattanaik, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 467 of 2000 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 1571 of 1999)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 266 words

G.B. Pattanaik, J.—Leave granted.

2.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

3.

The Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court has directed payment of compensation to the tune of Rs. 20,000/- to the widow of deceased Debu Pramanik in lieu of compensation granted by the Human Rights Commission.

4.

When the matter came up before this Court, a limited notice was issued on the question of compensation.

5.

Learned Counsel for the appellant forcefully contends that the quantum of compensation to the tune of Rs. 20,000/- is too meagre even to have a sustenance for the widow and the other family members and at least the compensation should be enhanced to the tune of Rs. 1.5 lac.

6.

The counsel for the State of West Bengal on the other hand contends that the Human Rights Commission of the State has considered the matter from all angles including the profession which was being pursued by the deceased before his custodial death and therefore the compensation to the tune of Rs. 20,000/- is adequate. Having considered the rival submissions and on the findings arrived at by the High Court of Calcutta we think it appropriate to enhance the compensation to Rs. 70,000/-. Since Rs. 20,000/- has already been paid, the State of West Bengal is directed to pay another sum of Rs. 50,000/- to the widow of deceased Debu Pramanik within a period of eight weeks from today. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

7.

Needless to mention that rest of the directions given by the High Court remain unaltered.