Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2021) 09 NCLAT CK 0072

Amit Bholanath Mishra vs Namaskar Service Station & Anr

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 24 September 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jarat Kumar Jain, Member (J) · Dr. Alok Srivastava, Member (T)
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No. 787 of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 159 words

Heard Learned Counsel for the Appellant. He submits that the Operational Creditor's claim is based on the forged & fabricated invoices and for the same, the Appellant has filed the complaint in Police Station. Thus, there is a pre-existing dispute. However, Ld. Adjudicating Authority has erroneously admitted the Application under Section 9 of the IBC.

We also heard on application I.A. No. 2087 of 2021 an application for stay.

Issue notice to Respondents on Appeal and I.A.No. 2087/2021.

Requisites along with process fee be filed, if not filed, by 27.09.2021. If the Appellant provides the e-mail address of the Respondent. Let notice also be issued through e-mail.

Let the matter be fixed 'For Admission (After Notice)' on 23rd  November, 2021.

At this stage Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that the proceedings of the CIRP is not stayed, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the Appeal.

He is permitted to do so. Thus, the Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.