High CourtsDivision Bench(2012) 01 SHI CK 0152

Amar Nath vs Sh. S. Roy, Secretary Forest to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla, Sh. Vinay Tandon, Pr. Chief Conservator of Forest, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla, Sh. R.K. Gupta, Conservator of Forest, Nahan, Circle Nahan and Sh. Ashok Chouhan, Divisional Forest Officer, Solan Forest Division, Solan

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 4 January 2012

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kurian Joseph, C.J · Rajiv Sharma, J
CASE NUMBER
C.O.P.C. No. 195 of 2011

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 407 words

Rajiv Sharma, J.—Petitioner was initially engaged in Dhaminana Nursery during 1986. He only worked for 15 days as a daily waged worker in the year 1986. Thereafter, he again worked for 90 days in Dhamiana Nursery in the year 1993. Petitioner has been working continuously as daily waged worker and has completed 240 days in each calendar year w.e.f. 01.01.1997 up to 31.07.2008 as per the supplementary affidavit filed by the respondents pursuant to the order dated 25.08.2011. Earlier stand of the respondent-State was that the petitioner has only worked up to 30.09.2007. In sequel to the directions issued by this Court in C.W.P. No. 173 of 2008, dated 27th May, 2010, the petitioner has made a representation. The representation made by the petitioner was rejected by the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla on 28.07.2011.

2.

Case of the petitioner before the authorities, in a nut-shell, was that since he has completed 8 years of service with 240 days in each calendar year, he was required to be regularized in the year, 2004. It has come in the reply filed by the respondents that the petitioner has not worked for eight years till 31st March, 2004. However, fact of the matter is that as per order dated 18th June, 2007, the incumbents who had completed eight years service on 31.3.2006 were required to be regularized. The representation of the petitioner has been rejected on the ground that he has not completed eight years service on 31.03.2004 and thereafter the sanction was granted by the Forest Department to fill up 1637 Class-IV posts on 7th August, 2007 and by that time, the petitioner had already attained the age of superannuation on 31.05.2007. In fact, the petitioner has completed eight years service on 31st March, 2005 and his case was required to be considered as per letter dated 18th June, 2007. Petitioner by that time has completed eight years of service. Petitioner has completed 10 years service on 31.01.2007 before his date of superannuation, i.e., 31.05.2007.

3.

Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of petitioner for regularization immediately after completion of eight years service in case the persons junior to him have also been regularized. The needful shall be done within a period of six weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this judgment by the petitioner. Consequently, the notices are discharged.