High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 12 P&H CK 0001

Amandeep Singh Gill and another vs State of Punjab and another

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 15 December 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Surinder Gupta
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
M-16289 of 2017 (O&M)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

34 paragraphs · 366 words
1.

The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482 Code

of Criminal Procedure (for short, '' Cr.P.C .'') seeking quashing of FIR No. 187

dated 20.12.2014 (Annexure P-1) along with all consequential proceedings

arising therefrom, registered for offence punishable under Section 420 read

with Section 120-B of Indian Penal Code (for short '' IPC '') at Police Station

Moga Sadar, District Moga, on the basis of the compromise by way of

affidavit of complainant (Annexure P-2).

2.

As per the allegations, both the petitioners received a sum

of Rs.12,65,000/- on different dates from the complainant, Raj Kaur for

getting her son exonerated in a case registered against him at Police

Station Kot Ise Khan, Moga.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter has

since been settled vide compromise by way of affidavit of complainant,

copy of which has been placed on file as Annexure P-2.

4.

Learned State counsel has also not disputed compromise by

way of affidavit of complainant (Annexure P-2).

5.

In order to verify the veracity and genuineness of the settlement

between the parties, they were directed to appear before the trial court and

get their statements recorded. The trial court has sent its report dated

18.09.2017 stating therein that the compromise has been effected between

the complainant and the accused which appears to be voluntary in nature

and without any pressure or influence.

6.

Keeping all the above facts in view, I am of the considered

opinion that it is a fit case in which the impugned FIR should be quashed.

Keeping the case pending will not serve the ends of justice. The quashing

of the FIR will provide the parties to this petition an opportunity to live in

an amicable, peaceful and harmonious atmosphere which is not only in the

interest of the parties but also for their families and ultimately the society at

large.

7.

For the reasons as discussed above, the instant petition is

allowed and the impugned FIR 187 dated 20.12.2014 (Annexure P-1)

registered for offences punishable under Section 420 read with Section 120-

B IPC at Police Station Moga Sadar, District Moga along with all

consequential proceedings arising therefrom, qua petitioners, is quashed.