High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 01 P&H CK 0015

Amandeep Singh And Others vs State Of Punjab And Another

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 11 January 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 619 Of 2024 (O&M)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 286 words

Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J

1.

The petitioners by way of this writ petition pray to stay the notification dated 07.12.2023 whereby the examination of JE and Senior Assistant/Inspector was announced to be held on 20.01.2024 onwards.

2.

Learned counsel submits that the said examination is a re-examination being conducted in relation to the earlier advertisement for filling up the post of JE/Senior Assistant/Inspector. The original examination, which was conducted, was scrapped by the authorities on the ground of there being some bungling for which an FIR dated 06.04.2016 was registered by the Vigilance Bureau.

3.

Learned counsel submits that the petitioners are those who participated in the earlier examination and had achieved higher marks, but on account of the FIR registered, they are now facing trial which is being directed to be concluded within six months by this Court in CRM-28840-2023. Learned counsel submits that the respondents ought to wait for the result of the criminal case, and should not conduct examination.

4.

I have considered the submissions.

5.

This Court finds that the decision to scrap the earlier examination was challenged before this Court in writ petition, and the same was upheld by this Court. The entire examination was cancelled. In view thereof, merely because the petitioners scored higher marks in the earlier examination, would not given them any right or claim. So far as the criminal case is concerned, the same is only examining the criminal culpability of the petitioners and has no relevance to the re-conducting of the examination by the respondents.

6.

In view of above, this writ petition fails and is found to be de hors merits.

7.

Writ petition stands dismissed accordingly.

8.

All pending applications also stand disposed of.