High CourtsSingle Bench(2015) 08 DEL CK 0002

Aman Kumar Rastogi vs State

Delhi High Court · Decided on 18 August 2015 · Citation: (2015) 3 JCC 2008

HON’BLE JUDGES
Indermeet Kaur, J
RESULT
Disposed off
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 1174 of 2015

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 319 words

Indermeet Kaur, J—The petitioner is seeking furlough for a period of three weeks to reconnect himself with the society and to look after two minor daughters and his aged parents. Nominal roll of the petitioner is seen. Petitioner is convicted under Section 302/201/354 IPC and he has been sentenced to undergo Life Imprisonment with the rider that he shall not be considered for grant of remission till he undergoes actual sentence of 25 years and pays a fine of Rs. 1,02,000/- ID 01 year and 01 week SI. Nominal roll reflects that as on date he has undergone incarceration for about 10 years and 10 months and remission not being entitled.

2.

On the first date this Court had kept this petition for its maintainability. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon a judgment of the Apex Court reported in Maru Ram and Others Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Others, AIR 1980 SC 2147 : (1980) CriLJ 1440 : (1981) 1 SCC 107 : (1981) SCC(Cri) 112 : (1981) 1 SCR 1196 where the Apex Court while dealing with the restriction on the powers of remission in the context of Section 433A of the Cr.P.C. had noted that the right of a convict to be considered for parole would not be affected even if his sentence is without remissions.

3.

There is no other substantial opposition to this petition. Accordingly, the petitioner is granted furlough for a period of three weeks (to be counted from the date of his release) on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- with one surety of like amount subject to the satisfaction of the Jail Superintendent with condition that he shall surrender himself forthwith before the Jail Authorities on the expiry of the said period of three weeks.

Petition disposed of.

A copy of this order be sent to Jail Superintendent for intimation to the petitioner.

Aman Kumar Rastogi Vs State — Delhi High Court, 2015 · CourtKutchehry