AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
5 paragraphs · 115 words
Lakshmana Rao, J.—There is no ground for dissent from the finding of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate that the land in dispute is in the actual
possession of the petitioner in Criminal Revision Case No. 689 of 1938 and the declaration of his possession u/s 145(6) of the Code of Criminal
Procedure is correct. But the direction requiring him to restore two old cemetries to their old state and allow access to Mussalmans if they should
desire to go near the cemetery to invoke the blessing of God is beyond the powers of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate and it cannot be upheld. The
direction is therefore set aside and otherwise the order of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate is confirmed.