High CourtsDivision Bench(2018) 03 CHH CK 0014

ALVINUS PANNA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 9 March 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, RAM PRASANNA SHARMA
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
WA No. 64 of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 171 words
1.

Heard.

2.

While dismissing the appellant/petitioner's writ petition, the learned Single Judge has also directed that the matter concerning fixation of the amount

of premium and annual lease

rent should be considered and decided by the Government expeditiously within a period of 3 months.

3.

Undeniably, the appellant is an occupant of the same land as an encroacher, over which, the proceedings for allotment is under process in his

favour. As a matter of fact, an order of allotment has already been made subject to payment of premium and annual lease rent, to which, the appellant

has objected on the ground that the same has been fixed exorbitantly.

4.

In the above admitted fact and situation, the learned Single Judge has rightly refused to interfere with the proceedings under Section 248 of the C.G.

Land Revenue Code, 1959.

5.

The appellant may pursue his application for reducing the amount of premium and annual lease rent, as directed by the learned Single Judge.

6.

The writ appeal is accordingly disposed of.