High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 04 DEL CK 4121

Alok Mehta & Anr. vs Kusum Mehta & Ors.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 29 April 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
C.Hari Shankar, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
TR.P.(C.) 96/2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 318 words
1.

Despite service of Respondent 2 by publication, Respondent 2 has not chosen to appear.

2.

Mr. Mahindru, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the property forming subject matter of CS SCJ 563/2021 presently pending before the learned Civil Judge, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, is also part of the subject matter of Test Case 7/2021, pending before this Court.

3.

Mr. Yashvardhan Singh Rathore, learned counsel for the Respondent 1, opposes the petition. He submits that the prayer in the civil suit, of which transfer is being sought, is fully covered by the prayer in the Testamentary case pending before this Court.

4.

That is a matter which has to be argued in the civil suit. It cannot constitute a justifiable consideration for this Court to bear in mind while dealing with the prayer for transfer.

5.

The principle that I apply to consider whether the suit should be transferred is whether the prayers in both the proceedings can simultaneously be granted. If that is not possible, it would be appropriate that both are heard by one Court so as to avoid conflict of decisions.

6.

The contention that the property forming subject matter of CS SCJ 563/2021 is covered by Test Case 7/2021 is not disputed by Mr Rathore.

7.

In that view of the above, there is no reason not to allow the Transfer Petition. Allowing the transfer petition would also be in the interest of avoiding any conflict of decisions.

8.

For all these reasons, the prayer for transfer of CS SCJ 563/2021 to this Court is granted. CS SCJ 563/2021 accordingly stands transferred to this Court. No order of consolidation is being passed, as that would be a matter for the parties to take up before the concerned Court.

9.

List CS SCJ 563/2021, after renumbering, before the learned Joint Registrar on 13 May 2024.

10.

The Transfer Petition is allowed accordingly.