High CourtsDivision Bench(2009) 10 DEL CK 0142

All India Institute of Med. SC. vs Rajesh Prakash and Another

Delhi High Court · Decided on 27 October 2009

HON’BLE JUDGES
Suresh Kait, J · Pradeep Nandrajog, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
L.P.A. 693 of 2003 and C.M. No. 1678 of 2003

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 321 words

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.—The appellant is aggrieved by the order dated 25.08.2003 passed by the learned Single Judge directing that in compliance with the mandate of Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the workmen be paid last drawn wages or the minimum wages, whichever is higher, from the date of the Award i.e. 11.02.2000 till the writ petition filed by the Management is disposed.

2.

The issue whether u/s 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 power of the Court is limited to direct payment of last drawn wages or it can also be directed that current minimum wages be paid stands settled by a Full Bench decision of this Court dated 24.05.2006 in LPA No. 84/2002 DDA v. Smt. Omwati and Ors....

3.

In view of the Full Bench decision of this Court in Smt. Omwati�s case (supra), Learned Counsel for the parties pray that the appeal may be disposed of with a slight modification of the impugned order.

4.

As per the impugned order, the wages have been directed to be paid from the date of the Award. Law requires the same to be paid from the date the Management filed the writ petition in this Court challenging the Award.

5.

We accordingly dispose of the appeal maintaining the impugned order insofar it directs the last drawn or current minimum wages, whichever is higher, to be paid till the writ petition filed by the Management is decided, but modify the date with effect from which payment has to be made. The payment would be made with effect from the date when the writ petition challenging the Award was filed by the Management.

6.

The appeal stands disposed of accordingly.

7.

No order as to costs.

CM No. 1678/2003 (for stay) in LPA No. 693/2003

8.

Since the appeal itself has been disposed of, this application has become infructuous.

9.

Accordingly, the application is dismissed as having become infructous.