High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 07 DEL CK 1970

Akram Saeed Khan @ Akram & Ors. vs The State NCT Of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 3 July 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
CRL.M.C. 4954/2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 419 words

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J (ORAL)

CRL.M.A. 18949/2024

Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.

Application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 4954/2024

1.

Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘Cr.P.C.’) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioners for quashing of FIR No. 370/2021, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC & Section 4 of D.P. Act registered at P.S.: Welcome and proceedings emanating therefrom.

2.

Issue notice. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for respondent No. 2 along with respondent No. 2 appear on advance notice and accept notice.

3.

In brief, as per the case of the petitioners, marriage between petitioner No.1 and respondent No. 2 was solemnized on 04.02.2018. Learned counsel for the petitioners has pointed out that the said marriage was performed according to Muslims rites and ceremonies though the same has been wrongly reflected as ‘Hindu rites and ceremonies’ in the petition due to typographical error. A female child was born out of the wedlock. Due to temperamental differences, respondent No.2 and petitioner No.1 started living separately. On complaint of respondent No. 2, present FIR was registered on 27.07.2021.

4.

The disputes have been amicably resolved between the parties in terms of Settlement Agreement dated 13.04.2022 and both petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 thereafter are stated to be residing together.

5.

Learned APP for the State submits that in view of amicable settlement between the parties, she has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

6.

Petitioners No.1, 3, 5 to 7 and respondent No. 2 are present in person and have been identified by SI Anugraha, P.S.: Welcome. Presence of petitioners No.2 and 4 is exempted. I have interacted with the parties and they confirm that the matter has been amicably settled between them without any threat, pressure or coercion. Respondent No. 2 also states that nothing remains to be further adjudicated upon between the parties and she has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

7.

Considering the facts and circumstances, since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, no useful purpose shall be served by keeping the case pending. It would be nothing but an abuse of the process of Court. Consequently, FIR No. 370/2021, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC & Section 4 of D.P. Act registered at P.S.: Welcome and the proceedings emanating therefrom stand quashed.

Petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

A copy of this order be forwarded to learned Trial Court for information.