High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 11 P&H CK 0007

Ajit Singh vs Narcotics Control Bureau, Chandigarh

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 16 November 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Hari Pal Verma
RESULT
Disposed
CASE NUMBER
27155 of 2017 (O&M)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

31 paragraphs · 322 words
1.

Prayer in this petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is for grant

of regular bail to the petitioner in complaint No.120 dated 13.01.2017, Crime

No.33 dated 20.10.2016 under Sections 8, 21 and 29 of the Narcotics Drugs

and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, the NDPS Act ) registered

at Police Station NCB, Chandigarh.

2.

The allegation against the petitioner are that on the basis of

information received by intelligence officer, Narcotic Control Bureau (NCB),

Chandigarh, the flat of the petitioner was raided and on search, a bag was

found lying on the bed. When the said bag was opened by the petitioner-

accused, a polythene was recovered which was containing 610 grams heroin.

3.

On 18.09.2017, learned counsel for the respondent-NCB has

stated that as against total 8 witnesses cited by the prosecution, 6 witnesses

have already been examined and the next date of hearing in the case was

29.09.2017.

4.

However, today, learned counsel for the respondent-NCB states

that though there were 8 witnesses cited by the prosecution, but the

prosecution has decided to examine only 6 witnesses. Out of these 6

witnesses, 3 witnesses have already been examined and the cross-examination

of 4th witness is required to be conducted by the petitioner-accused. The case

is now fixed for 24.11.2017 for cross-examination of 4th witness and

examination of remaining prosecution witnesses.

5.

He further states that in all probabilities, examination of all the

prosecution witnesses shall be completed within two months from today.

6.

Noticing the submissions made by learned counsel for the

respondent-NCB, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this

petition at this stage.

7.

Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of as such.

It is made clear that in case the prosecution fails to complete its

evidence within the aforesaid period of two months from today, the petitioner

shall be at liberty to approach the trial Court for the relief claimed in the

present petition.