AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
On consideration of submissions made on behalf of the
respective parties and the material made available for my perusal
as well as the evidence collected during investigation, which has
been produced before me by way of case diary, and more
particularly looking to the fact that Allegation against the
petitioner is that being Manager of Educational Institution, he was
involved in fabrication of forged certificate.
Considering the fact that beneficiary of such forged
document has already been enlarged on bail by order of
Coordinate Bench of this court, I find no reason to deny the same
to the present petitioner but without expressing any final opinion
on the merit and de-merit of the case, I am inclined to grant
benefit of anticipatory bail to the accused-petitioner.
Consequently, the application for anticipatory bail
is allowed.
The SHO/IO/Arresting Authority, Police Station
Udhyog Nagar, District Bharatpur in FIR No.44/2017 is directed
that in the event of arrest of the petitioner Ajeet Singh S/o Vinod
Kumar, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes
personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the
like amount to his satisfaction on the following conditions :-
(i) That the petitioner shall make himself
available for interrogation by a police officer
as and when required;
(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or
indirectly make any inducement, threat or
promise to any person acquainted with the
facts of case so as to dissuade him from
disclosing such facts to the court or any
police officer, and
(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave
India without previous permission of the
court.