High CourtsDivision Bench(2024) 05 DEL CK 0052

Ajayraj Construction Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. . vs Commissioner Of Central Tax, GST, Delhi , East, New Delhi

Delhi High Court · Decided on 9 May 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J · Ravinder Dudeja, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 4145 Of 2024, Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 16942 Of 2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 314 words

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J

1.

Petitioner impugns Order in Original dated 19.12.2023 whereby the show cause notice dated 28.04.2021 has been disposed of.

2.

Reference may be had to paragraph 21 of the impugned order which records as under:-

21.

Written Submission of the Noticee:

The Noticee did not submit any written reply in response to Demand-cum-Show Cause Notice No.27 /JC/2022-23 dated 28.04.2022 issued by the Joint Commissioner CGST, Delhi East.

3.

We may, however, note that personal hearing opportunity was granted to the petitioner repeatedly. However, none appears for the petitioner. The impugned order notes that as neither any reply was received from the noticee nor any one attended the hearing. The matter was proceeded further.

4.

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent concedes that a reply was filed by the petitioner, however, appears to have escaped the notice of the Adjudicating Authority when the final order was passed.

5.

As noticed hereinabove and as conceded by the respondent that a reply was filed but the same was not taken into account by the Adjudicating Authority while passing the impugned order. The impugned order is accordingly set aside. The show cause notice is restored on the record of the Adjudicating Authority. The Adjudicating Authority shall decide the show cause notice in accordance with law after giving one opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner.

6.

It is clarified that in case petitioner once again fails to appear pursuant to the hearing being granted, the Adjudicating Authority would be at liberty to proceed further with the adjudication of the show cause notice ex parte. However, after taking into consideration the reply filed by the petitioner.

7.

The petition is accordingly disposed of in the above terms.

8.

It is clarified that this Court has neither considered nor commented on the merits and contentions of either party. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved.