High CourtsSingle Bench(2023) 11 MAD CK 0115

Ajaybudha vs State

Madras High Court · Decided on 9 November 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
C.V.Karthikeyan, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Original Petition No. 25646 Of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 335 words

C.V.Karthikeyan, J

1.

The petitioner/A2, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 27.08.2023 for the offences under Section 395 of IPC, in Crime No.444 of 2023, seeks bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant and others were playing cards for money at Indira Nagar in Kodungaiyur, at that time, all the accused persons went over there and robbed cash for Rs.20,000/-one mobile phone and also gold chain.

3.It is stated that the mobile phone, gold chain and cash for Rs.1000/- had been recovered.

4.It is stated that all the accused have been granted bail except A9.

5.Taking into consideration the period of incarceration and all the accused have been granted bail except A9, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned X Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai and on further conditions that:

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.