Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2021) 03 CAT CK 0016

Ajay Mohan Joshi & Others vs Union Of India & Others

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 1 March 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
L. Narasimha Reddy, J · Mohd. Jamshed, Member (A)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Original Application No. 491 Of 2021, Miscellaneous Application No. 582, 610 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 468 words

L. Narasimha Reddy, J

MA No. 582/2021

1.

This Application is filed with a prayer to condone the delay of 395 days in filing the OA. For the reasons stated in the MA, the same is allowed.

OA No.491/2021

2.

The applicants retired from Military Engineering Services (MES). There used to be a facility of reemployment of the retired persons, under the 2001 Recruitment Rules for the post of Junior Engineer of different categories. The rules were amended in the year 2011. Earlier, the qualification used to be Degree in Civil Engineering from a recognized University or three years Diploma in Civil Engineering from recognized Institute or University or Board, and two years Diploma from the Military Engineering College (CME) Pune, was also treated as equivalent. In the year 2011 amendment, the equivalent part of it was omitted, and thereby the applicants did not become eligible for re-employment.

3.

Earlier, they filed OA No.2333/2018 with a prayer to direct the respondents to remove the anomaly in the Rules. The OA was disposed of with a direction to the respondents to take necessary steps in this behalf. An order was passed on 25.01.2019 stating that the proposal was mooted for amendment of the Recruitment Rules, and it is under consideration by the Ministry. It was also stated that the appointment on re-employment to those posts would commence as soon as the relevant rules are published. The applicants feel aggrieved by the nature of response by the department. According to them, an immediate action ought to have been taken to amend the Recruitment Rules by removing the anomaly, and on account of the delay, they are put to serious hardship.

4.

We heard Shri Ankur Chhibber, learned counsel for the applicants and Shri K. M. Singh, learned counsel for the respondents.

5.

There was a substantial change as to the qualifications stipulated under the 2001 Rules on the one hand, and 2011 amendments, on the other hand. It is not known as to whether the clause pertaining to equivalence of the Diploma was omitted accidentally, or on the basis of a conscious decision. As of now, there is a proposal from the lower level of Ministry, for amendment. A final decision in this behalf needs to be taken, particularly, when the process of re-employment is put on hold.

6.

We, therefore, dispose of the OA directing the respondents to finalize the issue pertaining to the proposal for amendment of the recruitment rules for the post of Junior Engineer, by way of re-employment, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. We make it clear that we do not express any view on merits of the matter.

All ancillary applications shall stand disposed of.

There shall be no order as to costs.