High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 08 RAJ CK 0006

Airtel Company (Bharti Hexacom Ltd) Broad Band vs Shri Hare Krishna Arya S/o Shri Sohan Lal Arya

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 2 August 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prakash Gupta
RESULT
Disposed
CASE NUMBER
492 of 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

37 paragraphs · 381 words
1.

The instant Civil Second Appeal under Section 100 CPC has

been filed by the defendant-appellant aggrieved by the judgment

and decree dated 12th April, 2017 passed by learned Additional

District Judge No.15, Jaipur Metropolitan in civil appeal

No.10/2015 whereby the court below has dismissed the appeal

filed by the defendant-appellant against the judgment and decree

dated 4th April, 2014 passed by learned Addl. Civil Judge (East)

Jaipur Metropolitan in Civil Suit No.220/2007. The learned trial

court by the aforementioned judgment and decree had decreed

the suit of the plaintiff respondent for permanent injunction

directing the defendant-appellant to close the Microwave Station

alongwith DLC and DG Sets within two months from the date of

judgment.

2.

The appeal has been filed with a delay of 11 days. An

application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has been filed to

condone the said delay.

3.

For the reasons mentioned in the application under Section 5

of the Limitation Act, the same is allowed and the delay of 11 days

in filing the appeal is, condoned.

4.

Shri VK Tamoliya, learned counsel appearing for the

defendant-appellant after arguing the appeal at some length, on

instructions of his client, has stated that a period of six months

may kindly be granted to the defendant-appellant to close the

Microwave Station along with DLC and DG Sets.

5.

In view of the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for

the defendant-appellant, this second appeal is being decided in

the following term:-

1.

The defendant-appellant shall be entitled to continue operation of the Microwave Station along with DLC and DG Sets up to 31st January, 2018 but not beyond that, subject to condition that he would close Microwave Station along with DLC and DG Sets on or before 31 st January, 2018.

6.

Further, the competent officer/authorised signatory of the

defendant-appellant shall submit an undertaking on oath incorporating the aforesaid condition before the trial court within a

period of four weeks from the date of this order. In case, the

defendant-appellant fails to submit the undertaking as aforesaid

within four weeks from today and/or commits breach of the

aforesaid condition of this order, the plaintiff-respondent shall be

entitled to execute the decree forthwith.

7.

The second appeal stands disposed of accordingly, Stay

application is also disposed of.