High Courts(1910) 03 MAD CK 0030

Adhiragi Chetty vs Billa Tyampu

Madras High Court · Decided on 31 March 1910 · Citation: (1910) 20 MLJ 944

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 125 words
1.

Exhibit B modifies the terms of the lease Exhibit A. It provides that on default of payment by the due date the rent in arrears shall be paid with

interest with the next year''s rent. If default is made even then, the property shall be surrendered to the lessor. Following the decisions in Naraina

Naikan v. Vasudeva Bhath ILR (1903) M. 389 and Narayana Kamti v. Handu Shetty (1901) M.L.J. 210 the defendant is not entitled to be

relieved against the forfeiture. It is, moreover, found that the tender in the suit was not of the whole amount due.

2.

We must reverse the decree of the District Judge and restore that of the Munsif with costs in this and the lower appellate Court.