High CourtsDivision Bench(1914) 04 MAD CK 0044

Adaikka Maistry vs Muthusami Ambalagaran and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 13 April 1914 · Citation: 25 Ind. Cas. 144

HON’BLE JUDGES
Wallis, J · Oldfield, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 140 words
1.

The finding is that the widow has alienated the whole estate and that the next reversioner has consented to the alienation. The rule that the widow may alienate the whole estate with the consent of the next reversioner is not affected by the recent decision of the Calcutta Full Bench Debi Prosad Chowdhry v. Golap Bhagat 19 Ind. Cas. 273 : 17 C.W.N. 701 : 17 C.L.J. 499 : 40 C. 721, or by the recent decision of the Privy Council Bijoy Gopal Mukerji v. Girindra Nath Mukerji 23 Ind. Cas. 162 : 12 A.L.J. 711 : 19 Cri.L.J. 620 : 16 Bom. L.R. 425 : 16 M.L.T. 68 : 27 M.L.J. 123 : 1 W. 533 : 18 C.W.N. 673 which only deals with partial alienations. The decrees were right and the second appeals are dismissed with costs.