Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2022) 07 ITAT CK 0017

ACIT vs Pawan Arya

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 4 July 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Saktijit Dey, J · Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, (AM)
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Income Tax Appeal No. 7756, 7759/DEL/2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 350 words
1.

The present appeals have been filed by the Revenue as well as by the assessee against the order of ld. CIT(A)-29, New Delhi dated 29.07.2019.

2.

At the outset, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted a letter which is as under:

“This relates to captioned revenue appeal before your honors listed on 27 June 2022 in F bench for AY 2017-2018. In aforesaid connection, it is humbly submitted that this is revenue appeal where initially protective addition was made in hands of present assessee (individual) and substantive addition was proportionately made in hands of companies (where assessee was director) M/s Galaxy Instruments Pvt. Ltd. and M/s Galaxy indicators (India) Pvt. Ltd. where substantive addition were confirmed in first appeal and when those company case appeals were pending before this Hon’ble ITAT (ITA 6394/DEL/2019 & 7455/DEL/2019) same stands hitherto settled under direct tax VSV (form 5 reed enclosed herewith : Ack number of Form 5: 82635576016220 & 8725140602312201.

In light of these facts, present revenue appeal in assessee (individual/director) case where protective addition was made in assessee’s asst, and where substantive addition confirmed at first appeal, is already settled in VSV in hands of aforesaid companies, so present appeal has become infructuous.”

3.

Cash seized of Rs.1,30,98,000/- was substantively assessed in the hands of M/s Galaxy Indicators (India) Pvt. Ltd. and M/s Galaxy Instruments Pvt. Ltd. The addition has been made on protective basis in the hands of Pawan Arya, the Director.

4.

The assessee has opted for Vivad-se-Viswas Act, 2020 and paid taxes of Rs.92,391/- against the tax arrears of Rs.3,69,564/- in the case of M/s Galaxy Instruments Pvt. Ltd. and paid an amount of Rs.3,86,250/- against the tax arrears of Rs.1,16,84,062/- in case of M/s Galaxy Indicators (India) Pvt. Ltd. for the A.Y. 2007-08. The Form 5 issued by the ld. PCIT, Central-3, Delhi have been submitted. In view of the declaration, the appeal of the Revenue and the CO of the assessee are being dismissed as infructuous.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the revenue as well as the assessee is dismissed as infructuous.