Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2019) 07 ITAT CK 0186

ACIT vs Bikram Vaish

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 1 July 2019

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhavnesh Saini, J · Prashant Maharishi (AM)
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Income Tax Appeal No. 4092 /Del Of 2016

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 220 words

Bhavnesh Saini, J

1.

This appeal by the Revenue has been directed against the order of Ld.CIT(Appeals)-18, New Delhi dated 01.04.2016 for AY 2012-13, challenging the order of Ld. CIT(A) in deleting the addition of Rs. 87,05,130/- made by AO on account of disallowance u/s 54F of the I.T. Act.

2.

Admittedly, the tax effect in the present appeal is less than Rs. 20 lakhs. Vide Circular No. 3/2018 dated 11th July, 2018 issued by CBDT u/s 268A of the I.T. Act, it has been directed that the Department shall not file appeal before the Tribunal in case where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limit of Rs. 20 lakhs. It is also directed that this instruction will apply retrospectively to pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in Tribunals. Pending appeals below the specified tax limit may be withdrawn/not pressed. The Ld. DR in view of the Board's Circular above did not press the Departmental Appeal. The case of the Department would not fall in the exceptions provided in the above Board Circular. In the result, the Departmental appeal is not maintainable as the appeal is filed against the Board instructions referred to above and, therefore, the appeal of the Department is liable to be dismissed.

3.

In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed.