High Courts(1903) 07 MAD CK 0008

Achuta Bhatta vs Manjunathayya and Another

Madras High Court · Decided on 14 July 1903 · Citation: (1903) ILR (Mad) 654 : (1903) 13 MLJ 358

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 108 words
1.

We are of opinion that a suit for a declaration of right in respect of Immovable property is not a suit in which the subject ''''matter of the claim

does not admit of valuation"" within the meaning of Article 35 of the rules framed under the Legal Practitioners Act. Such a suit falls within Art"". 31

and a reference to Rule 33 which defines the expression, the amount or value of the claim occurring in Rules 31 and 32, clearly shows that Rule 31

is not confined to cases in which Court fees are payable ad valorem. Our answer to the question referred is in the affirmative.