Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2023) 05 NCLAT CK 0900

Accipiter Investments Aircraft 2 Ltd. vs Interim Resolution Professional Of Go Airlines (India) Ltd., Abhilash Lal

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi · Decided on 24 May 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ashok Bhushan, J · Naresh Salecha, Member (Technical)
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 631 of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 321 words

O R D E R

Ashok Bhushan, J.

These three Appeal(s) have been filed against the judgment and order dated 10.05.2023 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi Special Bench, admitting Section 10 Application filed by Corporate Applicant - Go Airlines (India) Limited (Respondent herein).

2.

The facts and submissions raised in these Appeal(s) are same as has been considered and decided by our judgment and order dated 22nd May, 2023 in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 593 of 2023 (and other connected Appeals) – SMBC Aviation Capital Ltd. vs. Interim Resolution Professional of Go Airlines (India) Ltd., Abhilash Lal. These Appeal(s) also deserve to be decided in the same terms as per our judgment dated 22nd May, 2023 passed in the above Appeal(s).

3.

In the result, these Appeal(s) are also disposed of in the same terms, i.e. in following manner:

(1)

The order dated 10.05.2023 admitting Section 10 Application is upheld.

(2)

The Appellant(s) are at liberty to file an appropriate Application under Section 65 of the Code with appropriate pleadings and material and Adjudicating Authority while considering the said Application shall not be influenced by any observations made in this order.

(3)

The Appellant(s) as well as IRP are at liberty to make appropriate Application before the Adjudicating Authority for declaration with regard to applicability of the moratorium on the aircrafts with regard to which Leases in favour of the Corporate Applicant were terminated prior to admission of Section 10 Application, which Application need to be considered and decided by the Adjudicating Authority in accordance with law.

(4)

The Appellant(s) and the IRP are also at liberty to make an appropriate Application under Section 60, sub-section (5) with regard to claim of possession and other respective claims of both the parties relating to the aircrafts in question, which need to be decided by the Adjudicating Authority in accordance with law.

Parties shall bear their own costs.