High CourtsSingle Bench(1997) 08 J&K CK 0015

Ab.Rashid Bakshi vs Hajra and others

Jammu And Kashmir High Court · Decided on 27 August 1997 · Citation: (1998) KashLJ 199

HON’BLE JUDGES
A.Q.Parray, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal No. 89 of 1995

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 352 words
1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

Vide impugned order, interim direction/relief has been granted by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Budgam, where under person of Abdul

Rashid Bakshi/petitioner has been made liable to pay Rs. 25,000/ as interim relief, when as per averments, his vehicle which is alleged to have

been involved in the accident is duly indemnified and insured with the United India Assurance Company and unnecessarily, he has been made to

indemnify the interim relief. The learned Tribunal should have addressed itself to the aspect of the case that though accident claims are to be

recovered no doubt from the owner and the erring driver and in case the driver or owner is indemnified by the Insurance Company, the usual

practice has been that same is being recovered from the Insurance Company subject to adjustment of the final award and that makes it easy and

also recoverable. Otherwise individuals like the present petitioner make the case drag on under appeals/revision etc. thereby the very purpose of

this legislation is frustrated.

3.

The purpose of incorporating Section 110 into Section 165 in the Motor Vehicles Act was to provide a Tribunal, an easy remedy to the victims

of motor accidents and under those provisions, the Insurance Company has been made liable to cover the risks which have been incurred by the

erring driver or the owner of the vehicle.

4.

In the case in hand, I feel that the Tribunal has deviated the usual track and thereby made this procedure a bit lengthy. The purpose of granting

interim relief is being frustrated. So it is a statutory relief which is to be given to a victim of the motor accidents and ordinarily should be recovered

from the Insurance Company who has to indemnify the same, no doubt subject to final out come of the claim petition. The order impugned is

accordingly modified to this extent and it is directed that let Insurance Company be asked to pay interim relief of Rs. 25000/ to the claimants. Let

the file go to the learned Tribunal for proceeding further in the matter.