AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
A. Badharudeen, J
This is a revision petition filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. challenging conviction and sentence entered into by the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Ponnani, as per judgment dated 22.06.2017 in S.T.No. 2512 of 2014 and also the judgment dated 20.02.2019 in Crl. Appeal No. 144 of 2017 passed by the Special Court for SC/ST (POA) Act Cases, Manjeri modifying the sentence.
As the matter has been amicably settled, the revision petitioner as well as the first respondent/the original complainant jointly filed Crl. M.A. No.1 of 2023 to compound the offence along with the revision petition. They also filed Crl. M.A. No.2 of 2023 to grant exemption from payment of cost of compounding/compounding fee.
Since the grounds raised seeking exemption to deposit the cost found to be convincing, deposit of cost stands waived.
Compounding an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the N.I.Act’) is permissible at any stage, since the same is a deemed offence. Therefore, there is no reason to disallow the compounding petition. Since the parties settled the matter, the compounding has the effect of acquittal under Section 320(8) of Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, compounding as sought for in Crl.M.A.No. 1 of 2023 is allowed. In the result, this revision petition stands allowed as compounded and the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court as well as the appellate court under Section 138 of the N.I.Act stand set aside and the revision petitioner/accused is set at liberty, forthwith, and his bail bond, if any, stands cancelled.