High CourtsDivision Bench(1886) 04 CAL CK 0023

Abirunnissa Khatoon vs Komurunnissa Khatoon and Others

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 13 April 1886 · Citation: (1886) ILR (Cal) 100

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mitter, J · Grant, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 78 words

Mitter, J.—We are of opinion that there is no appeal in this case. All orders made u/s 32 of the CPC are not appealable by the second Clause of Section 588, but only orders striking out or adding the name of any person as plaintiff or defendant. As the order against which this appeal has been preferred doses not come within the purview of this clause, we think there is no appeal. The appeal is rejected with costs.