High CourtsDivision Bench(2025) 10 DEL CK 2000

Abhishek vs Union Of India & Ors.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 14 October 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
C. Hari Shankar, J · Om Prakash Shukla, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
W.P.(C) 15801/2025, CM APPL. 64746/2025 & 64747/2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 318 words

C. Hari Shankar, J.

1.

The petitioner assails the decision to disqualify him from induction into the Central Armed Police Forces1, owing to his cardiac condition.

2.

We find that the reports of the DME2 and the RME3 differ from each other in so far as the Tachycardia from which the petitioner is stated to be suffering is concerned. Moreover, it does not appear that either of the Boards includes a qualified Cardiologist.

3.

In these circumstances, we had suggested to the respondent that we could dispose of the matter by directing the petitioner to be examined by a Cardiologist who would give her qualified opinion as to whether the petitioner actually suffer from Tachycardia.

4.

Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb, learned CGSC, on instructions, is agreeable to a disposal of this petition with a direction that the petitioner be examined by a qualified Cardiologist in the Army Research and Referral Hospital.

5.

Accordingly, let the petitioner be examined by a qualified Cardiologist in the Army Research and Referral Hospital. The Cardiologist would also be provided copies of the DME and the RME reports.

6.

The Cardiologist would arrive at an informed decision as to whether the petitioner suffers from Tachycardia as would disqualify him from being recruited in the CAPF.

7.

We request the Medical Superintendent of the Army Research and Referral Hospital to have the petitioner examined by a competent Cardiologist on 21 October 2025 for the aforesaid purpose.

8.

Ms. Esha Mazumdar, who appears for the petitioner, submits, on instructions, that his client would abide by the decision of the Cardiologist of the Army Research and Referral Hospital. Needless to say, if the petitioner is found medically fit for the post, he would be entitled to be appointed at par with other persons who were found fit and appointed.

3 Review Medical Examination

9.

The petition is disposed of, in the aforesaid terms.

Footnotes

  1. 1.CAPF
  2. 2.Detailed Medical Examination