High CourtsDivision Bench(2006) 08 P&H CK 0208

Abhinav Tandon vs State of Haryana and Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 22 August 2006

HON’BLE JUDGES
Viney Mittal, J · H.S. Bhalla, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 486 words

Viney Mittal, J.—The petitioner has approached this Court challenging the resumption proceedings. Additionally, the order passed by the appellate as well as the revisional authority have also been challenged. The resumption has been ordered against the petitioner on account of non-payment of the outstanding dues.

2.

On February 6, 2006, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner had made a statement before this Court that the petitioner was ready to deposit an amount of Rs. 10 Lacs which was due and payable by the petitioner with regard to the property in question. On March 20, 2006 this Court had noticed that the petitioner had deposited an amount of Rs. 10,00,000/- with the Registry of this Court. Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner has stated that the aforesaid amount of Rs. 10,00,000/- would completely cover all the outstanding dues payable by the petitioner and if the aforesaid amount is ordered to be adjusted towards the outstanding dues nothing more is payable.

3.

Sh. Arun Walia, learned Counsel appearing for the respondents, however, states that in spite of the repeated opportunities granted to the petitioner, the petitioner had failed to deposit the outstanding dues. Keeping in view the law laid down by the Apex Court in 2004(2) SCC Teri Oat Estates (P) Ltd. v. U.T. Chandigarh and Ors., we are satisfied that once the petitioner has shown his bonafides by depositing an amount of Rs. 10 Lacs which according to the petitioner is full and final payment of the outstanding dues, resumption order passed against the petitioner is liable to be set aside.

4.

Consequently, we allow the present petition and set aside the resumption orders passed against the petitioner qua the Plot No. 269-P, Sector 38, Gurgaon. As a consequence thereof, we also set aside the orders passed by the appellate as well as the revisional authorities. The Registry is directed to refund forthwith the amount of Rs. 10 Lacs deposited by the petitioner in terms of the order dated February 5, 2006. The petitioner shall be required to deposit the aforesaid amount of Rs. 10 Lacs with the Estate Officer, HUDA, Gurgaon within a period of 2 weeks of the receipt of a certified copy of this order On receipt of the aforesaid amount, the Estate Officer, HUDA, Gurgaon shall communicate to the petitioner if any further amount is still outstanding and payable by the petitioner. On receipt of the aforesaid communication, the petitioner shall deposit all the outstanding dues as required by the aforesaid written communication within a period of three weeks from the receipt of the communication.

5.

We, however, make it clear that in case the petitioner fails to deposit the amount(s) as directed above, the present petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed and in such a situation the resumption orders passed against the petitioner shall stand automatically revived. Copy of the order be given dasti on payment of the usual charges.