High CourtsDivision Bench(1914) 03 MAD CK 0009

Abdul Karim Sahib of V. Khadir Hussain Sahib and Co. and Others vs Timmaraya Chetty

Madras High Court · Decided on 4 March 1914 · Citation: AIR 1914 Mad 117(2) : 24 Ind. Cas. 512

HON’BLE JUDGES
Wallis, J · Ayling, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 60 words
1.

The failure of the decree-holder-purchaser to take proceedings under Order XXI, Rule 97, of the CPC within the time limited by Article 167 of

the Limitation Act does not prevent him for putting in a fresh application for delivery of possession under Order XXI, Rule 95. Muttia v. Appasami

13 M. 504.

2.

This appeal is dismissed with costs.