High CourtsDivision Bench(2014) 01 AP CK 0145

ABC Engineering Works vs Commissioner of Cus., C. Ex. & S.T.

Andhra Pradesh High Court · Decided on 29 January 2014 · Citation: (2015) 315 ELT 502

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, C.J · Sanjay Kumar, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 2103 of 2014

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 202 words

Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, C.J.—The extraordinary situation has arisen in the matter as we find that the learned Tribunal has not been able to dispose of the stay application when it was filed in the year 2012. We are of the view that application of this nature should be heard out expeditiously and an endeavour should be made to see that the same is disposed of within a period of two months from the date of its filing. Else, both the litigating parties will be put to serious problem, as the Revenue is always active to implement the order passed by the lower authority. On the other hand, without having the application being heard, the assessee is forced to accept the order passed by the lower authority before his application for stay is adjudicated.

2.

In the circumstances, we feel that the learned Tribunal should dispose of the stay application within a period of two months from today and the action, which is said to have been taken place, will abide by the result of the application, which is pending for adjudication before the Tribunal.

3.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.