High CourtsDivision Bench(2020) 12 DEL CK 0094

ABC vs Union Of India & Anr

Delhi High Court · Decided on 7 December 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dhirubhai Naranbhai Patel, CJ · Prateek Jalan, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 9804 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 331 words

D.N.Patel, CJ

Proceedings in the matter have been conducted through video conferencing.

C.M.No.31251/2020 (exemptions)

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

The application is disposed of.

W.P.(C) No.9804/2020

1.

This writ petition has been preferred with the following prayers:-

“1. Mandamus directing and commanding the respondents to consider the representation dated 15.07.2019;

2.

Issue directions to the respondents to constitute a committee so as to consider the case of the petitioner in a time-bound period;

3.

Any other appropriate writ, order and/ or direction in the facts and circumstances of the case as this Hon'ble Court may deem just and

equitable. â€​

2.

Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the petitioner had supplied

certain intelligence input to the Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence, Delhi Zonal Unit. The said intelligence supplied by the petitioner

was found to be true and correct. A detailed order-in-original dated 30.06.2016 was passed. The intelligence as supplied by the petitioner ultimately

resulted in recovery of huge amount of tax, penalty etc. Now, the grievance of the petitioner is that as per the reward policy floated by the

respondents (which is at Annexure A-6 to the memo of this writ petition), the reward as stipulated has not been paid to him.

3.

We, therefore, direct the learned counsel for the petitioner to furnish the details of the petitioner along with the representation filed by the petitioner

to the learned counsel who is appearing for respondent No.1, in a sealed cover. The learned counsel for respondent No.1, in turn, shall supply the said

details to the concerned respondent authorities in a sealed cover.

4.

The representation will be decided by the concerned respondent authorities in accordance with law, rules, regulations and Government policies

applicable to the facts of the case and on the basis of materials on record, as expeditiously as possible and practicable.

5.

With these observations, this writ petition is disposed of.