High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 07 GUJ CK 0059

Aartiben W/O Vijaybhai @ Chako Jashbhai Chavda vs State Of Gujarat

Gujarat High Court · Decided on 21 July 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ashutosh J. Shastri, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
R/Criminal Misc.Application No. 9409 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

37 paragraphs · 676 words

Ashutosh J. Shastri, J

1.

The present application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for regular bail in connection with FIR being

C.R.No.11204021200575 of 2020 registered with Dakor Police Station, District â€" Kheda for offence under Sections 406, 420, 494, 495 and 114 of

the IPC.

2.

Mr.Tejas P. Satta, learned advocate for the applicant, has submitted that the applicant is an innocent person and has wrongly been arraigned in the

prosecution. Furthermore, the applicant is a lady accused having infant child aged about 10 months and as such, considering this situation also, the

request be considered on some suitable conditions. It has also been submitted that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by the terms that she will

not leave the village without express permission of the authority, at least till the charge-sheet is filed.

Further, the applicant has not played any active role in commission of crime and hence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing

suitable conditions.

3.

Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent State has opposed grant of regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence. It has

further been submitted that the learned Sessions Judge has considered the every aspect of the matter and also examined the role played by the

applicant and as such, the request may not be considered.

4.

Learned Advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties do not press for further reasoned order.

5.

Having heard the learned advocates for the parties and perusing the material placed on record, it appears that the applicant is a lady accused,

having minor baby girl aged about 10 months and she is in custody along with infant. As a result of this, considering the fact that the applicant is a lady

accused and is in such a precarious position, the Court is inclined to consider the request for regular bail, more particularly when she has shown her

readiness and willingness to cooperate with the investigation and would abide by other conditions including the condition of not leaving the village till

the charge-sheet is filed.

6.

This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra Vs. Central Bureau of

Investigation, reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

7.

Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with FIR being

C.R.No.11204021200575 of 2020 registered with Dakor Police Station, District â€" Kheda on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that she shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;

[c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week;

[d] not leave India without prior permission of the Sessions Judge concerned;

[e] furnish the present address of residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change

the residence without prior permission of this Court;

8.

The authorities will release the applicant only if she is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the

above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter. Bail bond to be

executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try thecase. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the

above conditions, in accordance with law.

9.

At the trial, the Trial Court shall not be influenced by the prima facie observations made by this Court in the present order.

10.

Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.

11.

The Registry is directed to communicate this order to the concerned court by fax and/or email.