High CourtsSingle Bench(2022) 01 P&H CK 0081

Aaisha Rahmani And Another vs State Of Haryana And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 31 January 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Harnaresh Singh Gill, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Writ Petition No. 834 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 306 words

Harnaresh Singh Gill, J

Case is taken up for hearing through Video Conferencing. This petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution for issuance of a writ

in the nature of mandamus directing respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.4 to 7.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1 was married to one Shafeek Ahmed and no child was born out of the said wedlock;

that petitioner No.1 was maltreated by her husband and later on, she was divorced on 13.07.2021, and that petitioner No.2 is also a married and his

marriage is still subsisting.

Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the petitioners are major and have performed NIKAH against the wishes of respondents No.4

to 7; that they apprehend danger at the hands of respondents No.4 to 7, and that they have sought protection to their life and liberty. The

NIKHANAMA evidencing their marriage, is on record as Annexure P-1. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated 24.01.2022

(Annexure P-4) to respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Nuh.

Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3-State only, at this stage.

On the asking of this Court, Mr. Ashok Singh Chaudhary, Addl. A. G. Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3.

Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the present petition with a

direction to respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Nuh, to decide the representation dated 24.01.2022 (Annexure P-4) moved by the petitioners,

and grant protection to them, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the

petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them.