High CourtsDivision Bench(1932) 02 MAD CK 0001

A. Narasimha Ayyangar vs K. Ramayya Chettiar

Madras High Court · Decided on 29 February 1932 · Citation: AIR 1932 Mad 560

HON’BLE JUDGES
Walsh, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 76 words

Walsh, J.—I think the preliminary objection that the petition does not lie must prevail. The order was passed by the Subordinate Judge in his

capacity of Election Commissioner and it is so heard. Whether that order is right or wrong or the petition which gave rise to it was rightly or

wrongly entertained no revision lies against it as he is a persona designata under the new Rulers 3(1)(3).

2.

The petition is dismissed with costs.