Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2026) 01 NCLT CK 3094

M/s. Info Net Asia Pvt Ltd

National Company Law Tribunal · Decided on 13 January 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jyoti Kumar Tripathi, Member (Judicial) · Ravichandran Ramasamy, Member (Technical)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
IA (IBC) (Dis) / 15 (CHE) / 2025 in CP / IBC / 536 / CHE / 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

59 paragraphs · 1,762 words

ORDER

1.

The present application has been filed under Section 54(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (herein after referred to as ‘Code’) read with Regulation 45(3) of IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016 by the Liquidator of the Corporate Debtor, seeking for an order for Dissolution of the Corporate Debtor viz., M/s. Info Net Asia Pvt Ltd.

2.

It is submitted that the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (hereinafter referred to as CIRP) of the Corporate Debtor was initiated vide order dated 02.08.2017 passed by this Tribunal in CP (IB) / 536 / (CHE) / 2017, upon an application filed by the Operational Creditor under Section 9 of the Code. It is submitted that the Corporate Debtor was admitted into Liquidation vide order dated 08.06.2022 passed by this Tribunal in IA / 308 / 2020.

3.

It is submitted that the Insolvency Resolution Professional (hereinafter referred to as IRP) was appointed vide order dated 28.08.2017. Then, the IRP made a Public Announcement inviting claims in News Dailies of New Indian Express and Dinamani on 01.009.2017, stating 14.09.2017 as the last date for submission of claims. It is further submitted that IRP had received only one claim from UCO Bank under Financial Creditor category.

4.

It is submitted that Promoter Director of the CD moved a revision before Madras High Court, challenging the order passed by this tribunal for admitting the CIRP in C.R.P No. 3278 of 2017. An interim stay was granted vide order dated 06.09.2017 in the CIRP proceedings. But, the said stay was dismissed by the High Court on 21.12.2018. Therefore, the IRP filed for the exclusion of 478 days of Judicial Intervention, which was granted vide order dated 28.02.2019.

5.

It is submitted that in the 3rd COC meeting held on 22.04.2019, the COC had replaced the IRP and appointed the Applicant as the Resolution Professional (hereinafter referred to as RP) vide order dated 02.05.2019. It is further submitted that in the 5th COC meeting held on 21.05.2019, an application for extension of CIRP for a period of 90 days was filed and granted vide order dated 23.05.2019.

6.

It is submitted that two Registered Valuers were appointed, N. Kumar and Yogesh Narayana Sundaram to value the assets of CD and invite the Expression of Interest (hereinafter referred to as EOI). It is further submitted that RP made Public Announcement on 10.08.2019 in Business Standard and Hindu Tamil inviting EOI.

7.

It is submitted that pursuant to the Public Announcement, the promoter director of CD, Mr. Thirugnanasambandam subjected a Resolution Plan to the tune of Rs. 4.27 crores, which was voted by 100% in its favour by the COC. The tribunal vide order dated 27.12.2019 admitted the same. But, the Resolution Applicant made a payment of Rs. 35 lakhs and failed to make the balance payment in line with the Resolution Plan.

8.

It is submitted that the applicant moved an application for Liquidation under Section 33 of the Code with a prayer to punish the director for contravening the terms of the Resolution Plan under Section 74 of the Code. This tribunal vide order dated 08.06.2022, appointed the applicant as Liquidator and directed the Registry to forward the order to IBBI and Secretary of Ministry of Corporate Affairs to initiate the complaint before the Special Court under Section 236 of the Code.

9.

It is further submitted that the Liquidator had caused a Public Announcement to be made for inviting claims from stakeholders in Financial Express and Malai Malar on 11.06.2022 within 5 days of the Date of Order. It is submitted that the Liquidator had prepared a List of Stakeholders based on the claims made. It is further submitted that an Asset Memorandum and a Preliminary Report was also filed.

Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment
Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment
10.

It is submitted that Thirugnanasambandam died on 14.10.2022 and the same was communicated to IBBI, who later on dropped the case filed by them.

11.

It is submitted that the Company in Liquidation had no Immovable Assets and that there were only certain receivables due from the Customers. The Liquidator had sought the details relating the same, but only partial information was known. Later, the Wife of the deceased provided the records and the applicant had demanded the repayment of dues, which was not given. The Applicant had filed an application seeking the permission to approach the MSME Council to initiate the recovery proceedings against the company which was allowed by this tribunal vide order dated 19.09.2023 in IA(IBC)/1612/2023.

12.

It is submitted that the UCO Bank, a financial creditor had realized an amount of Rs. 5.67 crores against the immovable property of the Company in Liquidation.

13.

It is submitted in the report filed by the Liquidator dated 29.08.2025 that, in accordance with the directions of the Tribunal, Stakeholders Consultative Committee meeting was convened on 30.06.2015 and with 100% voting, the SCC had resolved to dissolve the company.

Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment
Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment
14.

It is submitted to appoint Ebenezar Inbaraj as the liquidator and vide order dated 08.06.2022, the Tribunal admitted the liquidation of the Corporate Debtor and appointed the Applicant herein as the Liquidator.

15.

The Liquidator caused Public Announcement on 11.06.2022 in Financial Express and Malai Malar inviting claims from all stakeholders. The Applicant had received the said claims, which were adjudicated and admitted. Later, a List of Stakeholders and the report on Asset Memorandum was filed by the Liquidator. Furthermore, it is submitted that the Preliminary Report was filed before the Adjudicating Authority.

16.

It is submitted that the Stakeholders Consultation Committee was constituted, submitted it to the Authority on 14.08.2022 as mentioned below: (Annexure 12)

Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment
Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment
17.

It is further submitted that the company had no immovable assets and that there were only receivables due from its customers. The applicant sought the details of the realization from the director, which were later obtained from his wife due to his sudden demise. Hence, the applicant filed an application for initiating the recovery proceedings against the customers of the company, which was admitted vide order dated 19.09.2023.

18.

It is submitted that the Applicant had approached the MSME Council to file the claims, but was advised not to initiate as the claims were time-barred. Also, the immovable property of the Guarantor was realized by the UCO Bank to a tune of Rs. 5.67 crores.

19.

It is submitted that Liquidation Bank Account in the name of M/s. Info Net Asia Pvt Ltd.in Liquidation bearing Account no: 409001821063 was opened on 22.08.2022 with RBL Bank, No. 397, Precision Plaza No.23, 3rd Floor, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai – 600 018 and the above mentioned account was closed on 05.04.2025 as per the direction from this Tribunal.

Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment
20.

It is further submitted that the Liquidation period was extended form time-to-time was that the last extension was granted on 17.03.2025. Hence, the applicant filed for the dissolution.

21.

It is stated that there are no PUFE application pending.

Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment
22.

The details of the relevant compliances as mandated under Section 54 of the IBC, 2016 read with the IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016 are listed here under:-

Sl.

No.

Particulars / Requirement

and Section / Regulation

Status / Compliance by

Liquidator

Remarks / Observation of Tribunal
1Commencement of liquidation - Section 33 of IBCLiquidation commenced vide NCLT order dated 06.06.2022 in IA/308/IB/2020 in CP No. CP/536/IB/2017Verified Annexure-10 Pg. 51-63
2Appointment of Liquidator - Section 34 (1) & (2)Shri. Ebenezar Inbaraj, Reg. No. IBBI/IPA-001/IP-P00754/2017-2018/11286 appointed as LiquidatorVerified Annexure-10 Pg. 51-63
3Public announcement of liquidation and call for claims - Regulation 12Public notice issued on Financial Express and Malai Malar on 11.06.2022Complied – Annexure-11 Pg. 64-65
4Submission, verification, and admission / rejection of claims - Regulation 12

Claims received and

adjudicated

Complied – Annexure-12 Pg. 66-69
5Maintenance of registers and accounts - Regulation 5(2) & Regulation 41

Proper records maintained

and audited

Complied
6Submission of progress reports and asset sale reports - Regulation 15 & Regulation 36

Periodic reports filed with

NCLT and IBBI

Verified
7Closure of bank account of liquidation estate -Regulation 44 (1)Bank account closed on 05.04.2025 after final distribution

Complied -

Pg 110

8Filing of Final Report -Section 54(1) & Regulation 45(3)

Final report filed enclosing

audited accounts

Verified – Annexure-20 Pg. 89-98
9Application for dissolution filed before NCLT - Section 54(2)

Present application filed on

07.10.2024

Verified
23.

It is further submitted that there are no remaining assets or liabilities, and that all the requisite statutory compliances have been adhered to and the Liquidator has submitted the Final Report, the Compliance Certificate in Form H, audited accounts, stakeholder distribution records, and other necessary enclosures.

24.

Heard the submissions made by the Learned Counsel for the Applicant and perused the documents on record. At this juncture, it is relevant to refer to Section 54 of the IBC, 2016 which reads as under:-

Section 54:

“(1)

Where the assets of the corporate debtor have been completely liquidated, the liquidator shall make an application to the Adjudicating Authority for the dissolution of such corporate debtor. (2) The Adjudicating Authority shall on application filed by the liquidator under sub-section (1) order that the corporate debtor shall be dissolved from the date of that order and the corporate debtor shall be dissolved accordingly. (3) A copy of an order under sub-section (2) shall within seven days from the date of such order, be forwarded to the authority with which the corporate debtor is registered.”

25.

In light of the above facts and circumstances, and upon perusal of the records and submissions made, this Tribunal is of the considered view that the requirements of Section 54 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 have been satisfied.

26.

From the averments made in the application, along with the perusal of the final report and the Compliance Certificate filed in Form- H by the Applicant, it is seen that the Corporate Debtor has been completely liquidated and has no realizable asset left with the corporate debtor, this Tribunal finds it reasonable to order for dissolution of the Corporate Debtor as per section 54 of the Code.

27.

The Liquidator has discharged his duties in accordance with law, and this Tribunal is satisfied that the affairs of the Corporate Debtor have been completely wound up.

28.

Accordingly, we order for the dissolution of the Corporate Debtor viz., M/s. Info Net Asia Pvt Ltd. The Liquidator is directed to forward the copy of this Order to the RoC concerned and also to the IBBI for its records within a period of 7 days from the date of this Order.

29.

Accordingly, this present application IA (IBC) (Dis) / 15 (CHE) / 2025 is Allowed and Disposed of.