← All articles

Key Wills Judgement

Supreme Court Upholds 1932 Will in Uma Sashi Devi v. Dibakar Banerjee, Ends Family Estate Battle

Updated 31 March 2026
Supreme Court Upholds 1932 Will in Uma Sashi Devi v. Dibakar Banerjee, Ends Family Estate Battle

COURTKUTCHEHRY FAQ ON INDIA’s LANDMARKS JUDGEMENTS ON WILL, PROBATE, CODICIL

 

Supreme Court Upholds 1932 Will in Uma Sashi Devi v. Dibakar Banerjee, Ends Family Estate Battle

 

Probate Not Required Under French Law, Sister’s Appeal Dismissed

 

₹5 Lakh Settlement Brings Closure to Decades-Long Inheritance Dispute

 

Summary Note of FAQs

The FAQs highlight that probate was unnecessary under French law, the brother’s claim through the 1932 Will was upheld, and the Court facilitated a ₹5 lakh settlement to end the dispute. This case is a precedent in succession law, especially for wills executed in former French territories.

The Supreme Court landmark judgement on Uma Sashi Devi v. Dibakar Banerjee (2012) highlights how the apex resolved a decades-long inheritance dispute by upholding a 1932 Will executed under French law, clarifying that probate was not required, and facilitating a ₹5 lakh settlement. This case is a key precedent in succession law, especially for wills executed in former French territories. [For more detailed reading and understanding of the case, please read here: https://www.courtkutchehry.com/pages/blog/uma-sashi-devi-vs-dibakar-banerjee-1932-will-probate-french-law/

 

Also check out these links for the key clarifications made in the judgment.

 

 

 

QUICK RECOMMENDATION:  Check out 123 Key Judgements, as highlighted in the book, WILL WRITING SIMPLIFIED, for the quick research and reference purposes. Click the link here: https://www.courtkutchehry.com/pages/blog/123-supreme-court-judgments-on-wills/

 

You Can Also Order the Book ONLINE, WILL WRITING SIMPLIFIED from here on: Buy online: Amazon | Flipkart

 

Key Subject Matter Issues Clarified

 

 

  • Probate not required for wills executed under French law in Chandernagore before assimilation.
  • Applicability of French Civil Code vs. Indian Succession Act.
  • Suspicion in settlement deeds and proof requirements for secondary evidence.
  • Judicial emphasis on settlement to end prolonged family disputes.
  • Succession governed by intestacy rules if wills fail under Indian law.

 

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS: FAQs

 

Q1. Is probate required for wills executed under French law in India?

No. The Supreme Court clarified that probate is not required for wills executed in French territories like Chandernagore before assimilation into Indian law.

Q2. What was the dispute in Uma Sashi Devi v. Dibakar Banerjee?

It was a family inheritance dispute where the sister claimed property through settlement deeds, while the brother relied on a 1932 Will under French law.

Q3. Why did the Supreme Court dismiss the sister’s appeal?

Because the Will was valid under French law, and the settlement deeds were not legally proved. The Court upheld the brother’s claim.

Q4. What settlement was reached in the case?

The Court facilitated a ₹5 lakh monetary settlement to end decades of litigation between the siblings’ heirs.

Q5. What is the significance of this judgment?

It reaffirmed succession principles under French law, clarified probate requirements, and highlighted the judiciary’s role in encouraging amicable settlements.