Babul Kalam Vs State Of Tripura

Tripura High Court- Agartala 8 Feb 2024 Anticipatory Bail No. 7 Of 2024 (2024) 02 TP CK 0031
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Anticipatory Bail No. 7 Of 2024

Hon'ble Bench

Arindam Lodh, J

Advocates

V. Poddar, Raju Datta

Final Decision

Allowed

Judgement Text

Translate:

Arindam Lodh, J

Heard Mrs. V. Poddar, learned counsel appearing for the applicant.

Also heard Mr. Raju Datta, learned P.P. appearing for the respondent-State.

Mrs. Poddar, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that due to some technical defects, she wants to withdraw the anticipatory bail application with a liberty to file afresh.

Considered the submission.

Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application is allowed to be withdrawn, and thus, disposed of as withdrawn with a liberty to file afresh.

From The Blog
Delhi High Court Mandates e-KYC for Domain Registrations to Stop Fraudulent Websites and Protect Consumers
Jan
11
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Mandates e-KYC for Domain Registrations to Stop Fraudulent Websites and Protect Consumers
Read More
Supreme Court: Civil Verdict Not a Shield Against Crime, Restores Criminal Trial in Family Property Dispute
Jan
11
2026

Court News

Supreme Court: Civil Verdict Not a Shield Against Crime, Restores Criminal Trial in Family Property Dispute
Read More