Shashank Singh Vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court 8 Nov 2024 First Bail Application No. 1677 Of 2024
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

First Bail Application No. 1677 Of 2024

Hon'ble Bench

Ravindra Maithani, J

Advocates

Bharat Chaudhary, Vipul Painuly

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred

Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 120B, 395, 412, 420, 467, 468, 471

Judgement Text

Translate:

Ravindra Maithani, J

1. Applicant is in judicial custody in Case Crime No. 520 of 2023, under Section 120B, 395, 412, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station Kotwali

Dehradun, District Dehradun. He has sought his release on bail.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that there is no evidence against the applicant except the confession of the applicant as well as the

statement of the co-accused. The applicant was confined in a jail at the relevant time.

4. These facts are admitted to learned State counsel

5. Having considered the entirety of facts, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

6. The bail application is allowed.

7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the

satisfaction of the Court concerned.

From The Blog
Moti Ram Deka & Ors vs General Manager, N.E.F. Railways & Ors (1963)
Oct
19
2025

Landmark Judgements

Moti Ram Deka & Ors vs General Manager, N.E.F. Railways & Ors (1963)
Read More
M/s. Orissa Cement Ltd. & Others vs State of Orissa & Others (1991)
Oct
19
2025

Landmark Judgements

M/s. Orissa Cement Ltd. & Others vs State of Orissa & Others (1991)
Read More