Kamakshee Bisht Vs State Of Uttarakhand & Others

Uttarakhand High Court 7 Nov 2024 Writ Petition Miscellaneous Single No. 2553 Of 2024 (2024) 11 UK CK 0011
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition Miscellaneous Single No. 2553 Of 2024

Hon'ble Bench

Pankaj Purohit, J

Advocates

Sandeep Kothari, Devendra Pant, Tarun Pande, Siddhartha Sah, Siddharth Jain, Abhilasha Tomar

Final Decision

Allowed

Judgement Text

Translate:

Pankaj Purohit, J

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for the purpose of appointment of a Guardian for her husband (Mukesh Joshi), permanent

r/o Alma Cottage Compound, Mallital, who is presently residing at All Saints College Campus, Nainital on the premise that husband of the petitioner is

in a comatose state.

3. Since there was no law holding in the field to appoint a Guardian of such a person, therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance on

the judgment rendered by Hon’ble High Court of Kerala dated 20.02.2019, passed in the case of Shobha Gopalkrishnan & another vs. State of

Kerala & others, wherein certain guidelines have been issued which are mentioned in para 35 of the said judgment. The judgment has already been

annexed with the writ petition as annexure-8 to the writ petition.

4. Though as many as 14 guidelines have been issued by the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala in the aforesaid judgment, but at this juncture, first and

foremost, it was necessary that condition of the person lying in a comatose state shall be ascertained by examining him, through a duly constituted

medical board of whom one member shall be definitely a qualified Neurologist and in lieu of condition no.3 of the guidelines issued by the Hon’ble

High Court of Kerala, a Revenue Authority not below the rank of Tehsildar was also required to submit a report with relevant facts and figures

including the particulars of close relatives, their financial condition and other aspect of the petitioner and her husband.

5. Since there was consensus between the parties to the proposition that the Medical Board is to be constituted as per the guidelines and be directed to

conduct the proceedings as per the guidelines, this Court vide order dated 25.09.2024 directed respondent no.3-Chief Medical Officer, Nainital to

coordinate with the Director, Medical Health, Kumaon Region to constitute a medical board (one member being Neurologist) and to examine the

husband of the petitioner (Mukesh Joshi), who is presently residing in his home, in a comatose state.

6. Pursuant to the order passed by this Court on 25.09.2024, the Medical Board has been constituted and the compliance affidavits have been filed by

the respondent no.2-Tehsildar and respondent no.3-Chief Medical Officer, Nainital, which are taken on record. Delay in filing the compliance

affidavits is condoned for the reasons stated therein.

7. From perusal of the compliance report of respondent no.3, which is annexed as annexure-1 to the said compliance report, the opinion of the Medical

Board is given wherein it has been stated that the patient-Mukesh Chandra Joshi, husband of the petitioner is in comatose and in bed ridden state. It is

also reflected from the said report that the Medical Board was properly constituted as per the directions passed by this Court on 25.09.2024 and

similarly, the compliance report has also been filed by the respondent no.2-Tehsildar, Nainital wherein the details of the family members and specific

property of the husband of the petitioner have been verified in para 3 to 7 of the said affidavit.

8. There is no difference of opinion of the learned counsel for the parties with regard to the compliance reports and they are in consensus regarding

the fact that the husband of the petitioner is in comatose state and is bed ridden and he owns a property as detailed by respondent no.2 in compliance

of the order passed by this Court. Petitioner thus prayed for appointment of the Guardian of the petitioner.

9. There is no opposition from the side of the respondents who includes brother, family members and partner in the property of the husband of the

petitioner, if the petitioner is appointed as Guardian of the husband of the petitioner.

10. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. Petitioner-Smt. Kamakshee Bisht, w/o Shri Mukesh Chand Joshi is hereby appointed as Guardian of her

husband-Mr. Mukesh Chand Joshi in respect of the property moveable or immovable recorded in his name and to deal with the bank accounts of her

husband and further to do all such acts as are necessary to the best interest of her husband. It is also clarified that the petitioner as Guardian shall be

entitled to sign any documents which are required to be signed by her husband.

11. Needless to say that if there is any misuse of power or misappropriation of funds or non-extension of requisite care and protection or support with

regard to the treatment and other requirements of the person lying in comatose state, it is open to bring up the matter for further consideration of this

Court to re-open and revoke the power, to take appropriate action against the person concerned, who was appointed as the Guardian and also to

appoint another person/public authority/Social Welfare Officer (whose official status is equal to the post of District Probation Officer) as the

Guardian.

12. It is also provided that the Guardianship so awarded by this Court can be revoked by the husband of the petitioner, in case he recovers and attains

the healthy life.

13. The affidavit of Tehsildar filed in compliance of the Court’s order dated 25.09.2024 detailing the property of the husband of the petitioner shall

form part of this order.

14. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of accordingly.

From The Blog
ITAT Mumbai Rules Full Addition for Bogus Purchases, Rejects 8% Estimation
Dec
13
2025

Court News

ITAT Mumbai Rules Full Addition for Bogus Purchases, Rejects 8% Estimation
Read More
Supreme Court’s Call for Speedy Trials: Lessons from Sanjay Dutt’s Appeal and Provisions in BNS
Dec
13
2025

Court News

Supreme Court’s Call for Speedy Trials: Lessons from Sanjay Dutt’s Appeal and Provisions in BNS
Read More