Motnath @ Govind Nath Vs State Of Rajasthan and Anr.

Rajasthan High Court 26 Jun 2024 Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 935 Of 2024 (2024) 06 RAJ CK 0054
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 935 Of 2024

Hon'ble Bench

Kuldeep Mathur, J

Advocates

Kamal Rathore, B.R. Bishnoi, Chail Singh

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act — Section 3(1)(w1),3(2)(v), 14A#Indian Penal Code 1860 — Section 376(2)(n), 376-D, 328, 344, 384

Judgement Text

Translate:

The instant appeal under Section 14A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been filed by the appellant

against the order dated 19.06.2024 passed by learned Special Judge, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases,

Jodhpur Metro in Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.170/2024, whereby the bail application filed by the appellant, who has been arrested in connection

with FIR No.36/2024 registered at Police Station Chakhu, District Phalodi, for offences under Sections 376(2)(n), 376-D, 328, 344, 384 of IPC and

Sections 3(1)(w1),3(2)(v) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, has been rejected.

Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the prosecutrix who is a mature married woman voluntarily went away with the appellant and

remained in his company for more than 15 days out of her own free will and volition. Learned counsel submitted that on relations between them

turning strained, the appellant has been roped in a criminal case by the prosecutrix. Learned counsel submitted that the appellant is in judicial custody

and the trial of the case is likely to consume sufficiently long time. On these grounds, he implored the Court to enlarge the appellant on bail.

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that looking to the seriousness of the accusation levelled against the

appellant, he does not deserve to be enlarged on bail. However, learned counsel for the complainant submitted that during the pendency of the present

appeal the parties have entered into a compromise and decided to settle their disputes amicably in the spirit of ‘Lok Adalat’ and therefore, he

has no objection in case the appellant is enlarged on bail.

Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned counsel for the respondent and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this

Court is of the opinion that the appellant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

Accordingly, the appeal under Section 14A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act is allowed. The order dated

19.06.2024 passed by learned Special Judge, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Jodhpur Metro is set aside

and it is ordered that the accused-appellant- Motnath @ Govind Nath S/o Rukhnath ,shall be enlarged on bail in connection with FIR No.36/2024

registered at Police Station Chakhu, District Phalodi, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/-

each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to

so.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Rejects NALSA Appeal Filed Sans Convict Consent
Oct
30
2025

Story

Supreme Court Rejects NALSA Appeal Filed Sans Convict Consent
Read More
Supreme Court Raps Insurers for Technical Appeals in Claims
Oct
30
2025

Story

Supreme Court Raps Insurers for Technical Appeals in Claims
Read More