Lizanne D'Silva Vs Melwen Silveira & Anr

Bombay High Court (Goa Bench) 22 Dec 2021 Miscellaneous Civil Application (Main) No. 2626 Of 2021 (Filing) (2021) 12 BOM CK 0121
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Miscellaneous Civil Application (Main) No. 2626 Of 2021 (Filing)

Hon'ble Bench

Manish Pitale, J

Advocates

John Abreu Lobo, V. Sardessai

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Portuguese Code Of Civil Procedure, 1939 - Article 1101, 1102

Judgement Text

Translate:

Manish Pitale, J

1. Leave granted to the Applicant to correct the typographical error in the name of Respondent no.1. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.

2. Heard learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant.

3. The present application is filed with the following prayer :

“a) To pass an order in terms of Article 1101 and Article 1102 of Portuguese Civil Procedure as applicable in Goa, and to direct the Civil Registrar

of Ilhas at Panaji to cancel the marriage between the applicant and the respondent that is registered under No. 462 of the book for the year 2002, and

make the necessary endorsement in the said register as against the said entry.â€​

4. A notice was issued on this application on 15.12.2021 with liberty to the Applicant to additionally serve the Respondent no.1 by email.

5. An affidavit of service has been filed on behalf of the Applicant stating that notice was served upon the Respondent no.1 through email. A print out

of the email is also annexed to the affidavit of service which shows that the Respondent no.1 was informed that the present application is listed for

final disposal today i.e. on 22.12.2021.

6. A perusal of the trail of email shows that Respondent no.1 has indeed responded to the email sent by the learned Counsel appearing for the

Applicant. It shows that Respondent no.1 is aware and put to notice about the listing of the present application for final disposal today.

7. The Respondent no.1 chose not to appear before this Court when the application was called out for consideration.

8. Mr. Sardessai, learned Additional Government Advocate, has appeared on behalf of the Respondent nos. 2 and 3.

9. The material on record shows that the competent Court at Dubai passed an order granting divorce on an application moved by the Applicant herein.

In the proceedings before the Court at Dubai also, the Respondent no.1 chose not to appear and oppose the application.

10. In view of the aforesaid circumstances, this Court sees no reason to deny the prayer made on behalf of the Applicant in the present application.

11. Accordingly, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) quoted above.

From The Blog
ITAT Mumbai Rules Full Addition for Bogus Purchases, Rejects 8% Estimation
Dec
13
2025

Court News

ITAT Mumbai Rules Full Addition for Bogus Purchases, Rejects 8% Estimation
Read More
Supreme Court’s Call for Speedy Trials: Lessons from Sanjay Dutt’s Appeal and Provisions in BNS
Dec
13
2025

Court News

Supreme Court’s Call for Speedy Trials: Lessons from Sanjay Dutt’s Appeal and Provisions in BNS
Read More